Latest THOMAS THOMAS Recallshttp://www.arfc.org/rss/feeds/autos/thomas/thomasThe latest automotive recalls from the National Highway Transportation Safety AdministrationMon, 06 May 2024 04:12:15 GMTen-us1440Copyright 2024, Eladrel Technologies, LLCAutomotive1988 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000031893000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1987 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000013695000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1986 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000033223000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000033222000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000013694000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000033226000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000033225000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1981 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000056207000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1980 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SEAT BELTS, FRONTMOVABLE PART OF SEAT IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE SEAT BELT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005366000056209000000264/recall.aspxTue, 08 Nov 1988 00:00:00 GMT1988 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000031893000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1987 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000013695000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1986 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000033223000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000033222000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000013694000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000033226000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000033225000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1981 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000056207000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1980 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURELUGGAGE RACK ABOVE THE SEATS PROTRUDES INTO THE UPPER LIMIT OF THE HEAD IMPACT ZONE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005324000056209000000272/recall.aspxTue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 GMT1987 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000013695000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1986 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000033223000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000033222000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000013694000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000033226000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000033225000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1981 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000056207000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1980 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURE, BODYOPENING THE ROOF HATCH PAST 90 DEGREES CAN DISENGAGE THE HINGE PIN RETAINER RING ALLOWING THE HINGE PINS TO WORK OUT.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000005019000056209000000275/recall.aspxThu, 02 Jul 1987 00:00:00 GMT1986 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC, FOUNDATION COMPONENTS, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSHEATER HOSE MAY CHAFE PRIMARY AND/OR SECONDARY HYDRAULIC BRAKE LINES AT THE MASTER CYLINDER.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004930000033223000000073/recall.aspxSat, 03 Jan 1987 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC, FOUNDATION COMPONENTS, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSHEATER HOSE MAY CHAFE PRIMARY AND/OR SECONDARY HYDRAULIC BRAKE LINES AT THE MASTER CYLINDER.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004930000033222000000073/recall.aspxSat, 03 Jan 1987 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC, FOUNDATION COMPONENTS, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSHEATER HOSE MAY CHAFE PRIMARY AND/OR SECONDARY HYDRAULIC BRAKE LINES AT THE MASTER CYLINDER.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004930000013694000000073/recall.aspxSat, 03 Jan 1987 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, 12V/24V/48V BATTERY, CABLESA BATTERY CABLE ROUTING CHANGE MAY CAUSE THE POSITIVE CABLE TO RUB AGAINST THE RIGHT FRONT SPRING REAR HANGER, POSSIBLY CAUSING A SHORT CIRCUIT IN THE CABLE AT THE POINT OF CHAFING. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: A SHORT CIRCUIT AT THIS LOCATION COULD RESULT IN LOSS OF ELECTRICAL POWER TO THE VEHICLE AND COULD POSSIBLY CAUSE A FIRE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004714000033222000000202/recall.aspxThu, 06 Feb 1986 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, DELIVERY, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSTHE BODY IS SUBJECT TO SHIFT FORWARD DURING AN IMPACT AND THE FUEL FILLER HOSE AND/OR FUEL VENT LINE HOSE MAY SEPARATE FROM EITHER THE FUEL FILLER NECK OR THE GAS TANK. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS 301. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: A FUEL SPILL COULD OCCUR AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN A FIRE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004616000033222000000153/recall.aspxThu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, DELIVERY, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSTHE BODY IS SUBJECT TO SHIFT FORWARD DURING AN IMPACT AND THE FUEL FILLER HOSE AND/OR FUEL VENT LINE HOSE MAY SEPARATE FROM EITHER THE FUEL FILLER NECK OR THE GAS TANK. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS 301. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: A FUEL SPILL COULD OCCUR AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN A FIRE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004616000013694000000153/recall.aspxThu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, DELIVERY, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSTHE BODY IS SUBJECT TO SHIFT FORWARD DURING AN IMPACT AND THE FUEL FILLER HOSE AND/OR FUEL VENT LINE HOSE MAY SEPARATE FROM EITHER THE FUEL FILLER NECK OR THE GAS TANK. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS 301. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: A FUEL SPILL COULD OCCUR AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN A FIRE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004616000033226000000153/recall.aspxThu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE, DELIVERY, HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGSTHE BODY IS SUBJECT TO SHIFT FORWARD DURING AN IMPACT AND THE FUEL FILLER HOSE AND/OR FUEL VENT LINE HOSE MAY SEPARATE FROM EITHER THE FUEL FILLER NECK OR THE GAS TANK. THIS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FMVSS 301. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: A FUEL SPILL COULD OCCUR AND POSSIBLY RESULT IN A FIRE.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004616000033225000000153/recall.aspxThu, 21 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1985 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURESANDERS WERE INSTALLED WITHOUT REINFORCEMENT PLATES AT POINT WHERE MOUNTING ANGLE BRACKETS ARE ATTACHED TO THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. FLOOR CHANNEL MAY CRACK, POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE SANDER TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF SANDER BECOMES DETACHED IT WILL POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OTHER VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004605000033222000000272/recall.aspxMon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURESANDERS WERE INSTALLED WITHOUT REINFORCEMENT PLATES AT POINT WHERE MOUNTING ANGLE BRACKETS ARE ATTACHED TO THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. FLOOR CHANNEL MAY CRACK, POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE SANDER TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF SANDER BECOMES DETACHED IT WILL POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OTHER VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004605000013694000000272/recall.aspxMon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURESANDERS WERE INSTALLED WITHOUT REINFORCEMENT PLATES AT POINT WHERE MOUNTING ANGLE BRACKETS ARE ATTACHED TO THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. FLOOR CHANNEL MAY CRACK, POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE SANDER TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF SANDER BECOMES DETACHED IT WILL POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OTHER VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004605000033226000000272/recall.aspxMon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURESANDERS WERE INSTALLED WITHOUT REINFORCEMENT PLATES AT POINT WHERE MOUNTING ANGLE BRACKETS ARE ATTACHED TO THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. FLOOR CHANNEL MAY CRACK, POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE SANDER TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF SANDER BECOMES DETACHED IT WILL POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OTHER VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004605000033225000000272/recall.aspxMon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1981 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURESANDERS WERE INSTALLED WITHOUT REINFORCEMENT PLATES AT POINT WHERE MOUNTING ANGLE BRACKETS ARE ATTACHED TO THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. FLOOR CHANNEL MAY CRACK, POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE SANDER TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF SANDER BECOMES DETACHED IT WILL POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OTHER VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004605000056207000000272/recall.aspxMon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1980 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR STRUCTURESANDERS WERE INSTALLED WITHOUT REINFORCEMENT PLATES AT POINT WHERE MOUNTING ANGLE BRACKETS ARE ATTACHED TO THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. FLOOR CHANNEL MAY CRACK, POSSIBLY ALLOWING THE SANDER TO BECOME DETACHED FROM THE BUS BODY FLOOR CHANNEL. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IF SANDER BECOMES DETACHED IT WILL POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OTHER VEHICLE ON THE HIGHWAY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004605000056209000000272/recall.aspxMon, 04 Nov 1985 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES, DOORS, LATCHTHE RACK AND GEAR TYPE LATCH ASSEMBLY OF THE EMERGENCY DOORS CAN BE OVERSTRESSED BY MISUSE OF THE INSIDE DOOR HANDLE, MAKING THE GEARS SUBJECT TO FAILURE. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THESE GEARS TO FAIL WHEN THE DOOR IS CLOSED, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OPEN THE EMERGENCY DOOR. THIS COULD RESULT IN PASSENGERS BEING TRAPPED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004479000033226000000289/recall.aspxTue, 19 Feb 1985 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES, DOORS, LATCHTHE RACK AND GEAR TYPE LATCH ASSEMBLY OF THE EMERGENCY DOORS CAN BE OVERSTRESSED BY MISUSE OF THE INSIDE DOOR HANDLE, MAKING THE GEARS SUBJECT TO FAILURE. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THESE GEARS TO FAIL WHEN THE DOOR IS CLOSED, MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OPEN THE EMERGENCY DOOR. THIS COULD RESULT IN PASSENGERS BEING TRAPPED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004479000033225000000289/recall.aspxTue, 19 Feb 1985 00:00:00 GMT1984 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TURN SIGNAL, SWITCHTHE TURN SIGNAL MECHANISM IN THE STEERING COLUMN MAY BREAK; THE BROKEN PIECE MAY BECOME JAMMED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. WHILE USING THE TURN SIGNAL AND TURNING IN EITHER DIRECTION, THE OPERATOR MAY EXPERIENCE EITHER INCREASED STEERING EFFORT IN THE TURN, OR BINDING IN THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE WHEEL IS RETURNED TO A STRAIGHT POSITION.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004359000013694000000231/recall.aspxTue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 GMT1983 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TURN SIGNAL, SWITCHTHE TURN SIGNAL MECHANISM IN THE STEERING COLUMN MAY BREAK; THE BROKEN PIECE MAY BECOME JAMMED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. WHILE USING THE TURN SIGNAL AND TURNING IN EITHER DIRECTION, THE OPERATOR MAY EXPERIENCE EITHER INCREASED STEERING EFFORT IN THE TURN, OR BINDING IN THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE WHEEL IS RETURNED TO A STRAIGHT POSITION.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004359000033226000000231/recall.aspxTue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 GMT1982 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TURN SIGNAL, SWITCHTHE TURN SIGNAL MECHANISM IN THE STEERING COLUMN MAY BREAK; THE BROKEN PIECE MAY BECOME JAMMED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. WHILE USING THE TURN SIGNAL AND TURNING IN EITHER DIRECTION, THE OPERATOR MAY EXPERIENCE EITHER INCREASED STEERING EFFORT IN THE TURN, OR BINDING IN THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE WHEEL IS RETURNED TO A STRAIGHT POSITION.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004359000033225000000231/recall.aspxTue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 GMT1981 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TURN SIGNAL, SWITCHTHE TURN SIGNAL MECHANISM IN THE STEERING COLUMN MAY BREAK; THE BROKEN PIECE MAY BECOME JAMMED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. WHILE USING THE TURN SIGNAL AND TURNING IN EITHER DIRECTION, THE OPERATOR MAY EXPERIENCE EITHER INCREASED STEERING EFFORT IN THE TURN, OR BINDING IN THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE WHEEL IS RETURNED TO A STRAIGHT POSITION.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004359000056207000000231/recall.aspxTue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 GMT1980 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TURN SIGNAL, SWITCHTHE TURN SIGNAL MECHANISM IN THE STEERING COLUMN MAY BREAK; THE BROKEN PIECE MAY BECOME JAMMED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. WHILE USING THE TURN SIGNAL AND TURNING IN EITHER DIRECTION, THE OPERATOR MAY EXPERIENCE EITHER INCREASED STEERING EFFORT IN THE TURN, OR BINDING IN THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE WHEEL IS RETURNED TO A STRAIGHT POSITION.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004359000056209000000231/recall.aspxTue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 GMT1979 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING, TURN SIGNAL, SWITCHTHE TURN SIGNAL MECHANISM IN THE STEERING COLUMN MAY BREAK; THE BROKEN PIECE MAY BECOME JAMMED IN THE STEERING COLUMN. WHILE USING THE TURN SIGNAL AND TURNING IN EITHER DIRECTION, THE OPERATOR MAY EXPERIENCE EITHER INCREASED STEERING EFFORT IN THE TURN, OR BINDING IN THE STEERING WHEEL WHEN THE WHEEL IS RETURNED TO A STRAIGHT POSITION.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000004359000053699000000231/recall.aspxTue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 GMT1981 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SUSPENSION, REAR, SPRINGS, LEAF SPRING ASSEMBLY, U-BOLT, LEAF SPRING TO AXLECERTAIN "U" SHAPED BOLTS USED TO ATTACH THE AXLES TO THE SPRINGS, WHEN INSTALLED AND TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATIONS, MAY BE STRETCHED BEYOND THE YIELD POINT OF THE MATERIAL AND COULD BREAK.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000003692000056207000000055/recall.aspxWed, 01 Apr 1981 00:00:00 GMT1980 THOMAS THOMAS RECALLED FOR SUSPENSION, REAR, SPRINGS, LEAF SPRING ASSEMBLY, U-BOLT, LEAF SPRING TO AXLECERTAIN "U" SHAPED BOLTS USED TO ATTACH THE AXLES TO THE SPRINGS, WHEN INSTALLED AND TIGHTENED TO SPECIFICATIONS, MAY BE STRETCHED BEYOND THE YIELD POINT OF THE MATERIAL AND COULD BREAK.http://www.arfc.org/commercial/thomas/thomas/recalls/000003692000056209000000055/recall.aspxWed, 01 Apr 1981 00:00:00 GMT