by General Motors, LLC
CHEVROLET GMT 560 RECALLS - (3 Recalls Found)
Since 1969, CHEVROLET has issued a total of 3866 car recalls worldwide. Of those recalls, only 3 have been for the CHEVROLET GMT 560 starting in 2005. This accounts for approximately 6.7% of the 58048 car recalls issued by the NHTSA since 1966. The GMT 560 accounts for less than 1.0% of all the CHEVROLET recalls issued since 1969. Compared to other car manufacturers, CHEVROLET ranks #3 in overall number of recalls issued by a car maker.
Please keep in mind these numbers are for statistical purposes only & do not necessarily reflect the quality of the CHEVROLET GMT 560 or CHEVROLET itself. These figures are based only on the number of recalls issued and NOT the total number of vehicles affected by a particular recall.
Find your CHEVROLET GMT 560 listed below. Results are sorted year from newest to oldest. Select the desired CHEVROLET GMT 560 to view the complete recall details.
Information provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
| View CHEVROLET GMT 560 Recalls Below ↓ |
|
2005 Recalls ↓
Problem: CERTAIN MEDIUM DUTY CONVENTIONAL CAB TRUCKS WERE PRODUCED WITH A BODY WIRING HARNESS WITH NO PROTECTIVE CONDUIT IN THE AREA UNDER THE DRIVER'S FEET TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR HARNESS WEAR. THE BODY WIRING HARNESS INCLUDES SDM WIRING THAT COULD BE DAMAGED FROM CHAFING AND WEAR BY THE VEHICLE OPERATOR. Recall Details - 3/18/2005
2004 Recalls ↓
Problem: CERTAIN MEDIUM DUTY CONVENTIONAL CAB TRUCKS WERE PRODUCED WITH A BODY WIRING HARNESS WITH NO PROTECTIVE CONDUIT IN THE AREA UNDER THE DRIVER'S FEET TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR HARNESS WEAR. THE BODY WIRING HARNESS INCLUDES SDM WIRING THAT COULD BE DAMAGED FROM CHAFING AND WEAR BY THE VEHICLE OPERATOR. Recall Details - 3/18/2005
2003 Recalls ↓
Problem: CERTAIN MEDIUM DUTY CONVENTIONAL CAB TRUCKS WERE PRODUCED WITH A BODY WIRING HARNESS WITH NO PROTECTIVE CONDUIT IN THE AREA UNDER THE DRIVER'S FEET TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR HARNESS WEAR. THE BODY WIRING HARNESS INCLUDES SDM WIRING THAT COULD BE DAMAGED FROM CHAFING AND WEAR BY THE VEHICLE OPERATOR. Recall Details - 3/18/2005
|