NISSAN PULSAR RECALLS - (5 Recalls Found)
Since 1978, NISSAN has issued a total of 1903 car recalls worldwide. Of those recalls, 5 have been for the NISSAN PULSAR starting in 1984. This accounts for approximately 3.3% of the 58048 car recalls issued by the NHTSA since 1966. The PULSAR accounts for less than 1.0% of all the NISSAN recalls issued since 1978. Compared to other car manufacturers, NISSAN ranks #11 in overall number of recalls issued by a car maker.
Please keep in mind these numbers are for statistical purposes only & do not necessarily reflect the quality of the NISSAN PULSAR or NISSAN itself. These figures are based only on the number of recalls issued and NOT the total number of vehicles affected by a particular recall.
Find your NISSAN PULSAR listed below. Results are sorted year from newest to oldest. Select the desired NISSAN PULSAR to view the complete recall details.
Information provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
| View NISSAN PULSAR Recalls Below ↓ |
|
1988 Recalls ↓
Problem: THE SOLDERED JOINT WHERE INLET PIPE ATTACHES TO THE FUEL TANK MAY BE CRACKED. Recall Details - 12/18/1987
1987 Recalls ↓
Problem: THE SOLDERED JOINT WHERE INLET PIPE ATTACHES TO THE FUEL TANK MAY BE CRACKED. Recall Details - 12/18/1987
1984 Recalls ↓
Problem: DUE TO IMPROPER OPERATION OF THE SECONDARY HOOD LATCH BY OWNERS USING EXCESSIVE FORCE ON THE LEVER, THE HOOD LATCH ASSEMBLY MAY BECOME DAMAGED, RESULTING IN SEPARATION OF THE SECONDARY LATCH FROM THE LATCH ASSEMBLY. Recall Details - 11/5/1984
Problem: IMPURE LUBRICATING GREASE USED IN THE HEADLIGHT SWITCHES COULD CONTAMINATE ONE OR MORE CONTACT POINTS. OPERATION OF THE HEADLIGHTS COULD BE DELAYED OR NOT LIGHT WHEN THE SWITCH IS TURNED ON OR WHEN THE DIMMER SWITCH IS OPERATED. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: LOSS OF HEAD LIGHTS WHILE DRIVING COULD RESULT IN A VEHICLE ACCIDENT. Recall Details - 3/1/1985
1983 Recalls ↓
Problem: DUE TO IMPROPER OPERATION OF THE SECONDARY HOOD LATCH BY OWNERS USING EXCESSIVE FORCE ON THE LEVER, THE HOOD LATCH ASSEMBLY MAY BECOME DAMAGED, RESULTING IN SEPARATION OF THE SECONDARY LATCH FROM THE LATCH ASSEMBLY. Recall Details - 11/5/1984
|