2008 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS Complaints

HAD A FLAT TIRE AND HAD TO INSTALL THE SPARE TIRE THAT CAME WITH VEHICLE. AS SOON AS I GOT BACK ON THE ROAD , THE STABILITY CONTROL LIGHT, THE ABS LIGHT AND THE I-P BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON. THE CAR WOULD GET ONLY 35 MPH. FOR ABOUT 7 TO 8 MILES, THEN PICKED UP SPEED SO I COULD RUN 50 MPH. UNTIL I HAD THE TIRE REPLACED. AFTER I HAD THE TIRE REPLACED I TOOK THE CAR TO A MECHANIC TO HAVE THE SYSTEM RESET SO THE LIGHTS WOULD RETURN TO NORMAL. THE UNIT THAT CONTROLS THIS HAD TO BE REPLACED BECAUSE THE DIFFERENCE IN TIRE SIZE HAD DESTROYED THE CONTROL UNIT. IT COST ME $313.50 TO HAVE A USED UNIT INSTALLED, IF IT HAD BEEN A NEW UNIT, IT WOULD HAVE COST OVER $600. FORD MOTOR CO. SHOULD HAVE TO PAY THE COST OF THIS REPLACEMENT BECAUSE THE DAMAGE WAS CAUSED BY EQUIPMENT THAT WAS SUPPLIED WITH THE VEHICLE WHEN NEW. *TR

THIS IS THE THIRD CONSECUTIVE MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS I'VE OWNED THAT HAS DEVELOPED A PEELING PAINT PROBLEM (ALL PURCHASED NEW). ONE INSTANCE OF THIS I COULD CHALK UP TO LUCK OF THE DRAW, A RANDOM DEFECT. BUT THREE AUTOMOBILES, SAME MAKE, WITH THE SAME PROBLEM? THIS DEFIES THE LAWS OF RANDOM CHANCE AND INDICATES AN ONGOING QUALITY CONTROL PROBLEM WITH THESE VEHICLES. THIS 2008 MODEL MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS WAS PURCHASED NEW AND HAD ABOUT 55,000 MILES ON THE ODOMETER WHEN I NOTICED THE PEELING PAINT. THERE IS NO REASON ? BEYOND SHODDY QUALITY CONTROL ? THAT THIS KIND OF PAINT PROBLEM SHOULD BE OCCURRING ON A FIVE-YEAR-OLD CAR. THERE IS EVEN LESS REASON ? BEYOND SHODDY QUALITY CONTROL ? THAT IT SHOULD OCCUR ON THREE CARS OF THE SAME MODEL. INTERNET SEARCHES INDICATE THIS IS A FAIRLY COMMON PROBLEM WITH THESE VEHICLES ? AGAIN REFLECTING SHODDY QUALITY CONTROL BY FORD. ONE WOULD THINK, OVER THE 10 YEARS THAT THIS PROBLEM HAS OCCURRED WITH MY GRAND MARQUIS MODELS, THAT FORD WOULD HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO RESOLVE THE SITUATION. APPARENTLY NOT. THEY HAVEN'T EVEN BOTHERED TO RESPOND TO MY LETTER TO THEIR CUSTOMER CARE (?) DEPARTMENT. *TR

THE LOWER RETAINER SLIPPED OUT (RETAINER TABS ARE CRACKED)OF THE COLUMN DISCONNECTING THE STEERING WHEEL FROM THE LOWER STEERING SHAFT. OBVIOUSLY COULD NOT CONTROL DIRECTION OF AUTOMOBILE - WAS ABLE TO STOP WITHOUT AN EVENT. THE NEW ASSEMBLY 'FORD PART NUMBER 7W1Z-3C529-A' LOOKS TO BE MADE AS THE ONE CURRENTLY IN MY AUTOMOBILE. THIS WILL ALLOW THE SAME SCENARIO TO HAPPEN AGAIN! I MIGHT NOT BE SO LUCKY THE NEXT TIME! I HOPE THE REPLACEMENT ASSEMBLY ?FORD PART NUMBER 7W1Z-3C529-B? CORRECTS THIS PROBLEM FOR OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT SAFETY. PLEASE CORRECT THIS DEFECT FOR THE STANDARD MODELS. I AM REQUESTING A REVIEW AND RESOLVE BY FORD MOTOR CORPORATION PAYING TO CORRECT THIS SERIOUS DEFECT. THANKS FOR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. [XXX] P.S. MY AUTOMOBILE IS IN THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF TEAM FORD OF NAVASOTA, TEXAS. THERE PHONE NUMBER IS 936-825-2225 INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

I HAVE 5 LOCATIONS WHERE THE PAINT IS PEELING OFF. HOOD, ROOF AND BACK WINDOW AREA. I HAVE SEEN OTHER GMS AND LINCOLNS WITH THE SAME PEELING. THE PEELING AREAS A GROWING IN SIZE. PIECES OF PAINT 1 INCH SQ COMES OFF AT A TIME. I SHOULD NOT HAVE THIS PROBLEM ON A 4 YEAR OLD CAR. I THINK FORD SHOULD FIX THE PROBLEM. I HAD A 1993 GM ALSO WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. BUT ON THE 93 CAR IT STARTED WHEN THE CAR WAS OLDER. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED WHEN HE NOTICED CORROSION ON THE ROOF. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR A DIAGNOSTIC TEST. THE TECHNICIAN TOOK PICTURES OF THE VEHICLE AND SENT THEM TO THE MANUFACTURER. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT ASSIST WITH THE REPAIRS. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000.

LOW BEAM HEADLIGHTS DO NOT WORK. HIGH BEAM WORKS AS WELL AS DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS. THE DEALER SAID THE LCM MODULE NEEDS TO BE REPLACED BUT DID NOT HAVE ONE IN STOCK AND WILL CALL ME WHEN IT COMES IN. MY CONCERN IS THIS PROBLEM HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE AT LEAST THE YEAR 2000. NOW I HAVE A 100 DEDUCTIBLE SERVICE WARRANTY ON THIS 2008 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS SO IT WILL NOT BE A GREAT EXPENSE FOR ME AS IT WOULD BE FOR OTHERS. THIS ISSUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY NOW. MY GUESS HERE IS FORD IS USING OVERSTOCKED EARLIER YEAR MODEL PARTS IN THE NEW MODELS BEING BUILT. I UNDERSTAND THIS IS A DEFECTIVE SOLDERING ISSUE. WHY NO RECALL? *TT

WHEN THE GAS GAUGE REGISTERS BELOW 1/2 TANK, AND THE TANK IS REFUELED TO CAPACITY, IT TAKES SEVERAL MILES DRIVING( APPROX. 30-50 MILES) FOR THE GAUGE TO REGISTER FULL. ALSO, IF THE TANK IS TOWARDS THE EMPTY MARK, AND THE CAR IS FILLED TO CAPACITY, AND THE CAR IS DRIVEN, THE LOW FUEL LIGHT WILL COME ON, AND STAY ON FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. AT TIMES, BEFORE THE CAR IS DRIVEN, THE CAR REFUSES TO START AS IF IT IS NOT GETTING ANY GAS. AFTER IT SETS FOR A WHILE, IT WILL START. *KB

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH THE CONTACT BEGAN TO DEPRESS THE BRAKE PEDAL TO DECELERATE WHILE APPROACHING A TRAFFIC LIGHT. THE VEHICLE SUDDENLY ACCELERATED ON ITS OWN AND THERE WAS AN INCREASE IN THE RPMS. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY AND OVER TIME BECAME PROGRESSIVELY WORSE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 63,000. UPDATED 10/4/11 *CN THE DEALER STATED THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS ADJUSTED TO HIGH, WHICH MAY HAVE INTERFERED WITH THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL. THEY LOWERED THE AUTOMATIC BRAKE PEDAL . UPDATED 10/24/11

THE AA CONTROL WENT OUT IN APRIL 2010. I HAD BOUGHT A FORD CERTIFIED 2008 GRAND MARQUIS THAT WAS OVER ON THE MILAGE WARRENTY BUT STILL UNDER THE TIME WARENTY. THE BLOWER WOULD ONLY BLOW AIR THROUGHT THE DEFROSTERS UNDER THE WINDSHIELD. I BROUGHT IT TI THE DEALER WERE I PURCHASED IT AND AFTER INSPECTION DETERMONED THAT THE AC CONTROL UNIT #3W7Z*19980 WENT BAD AND WAS TOLD IT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED @650.00 FORD WOULD NOT HONOR THE WARRENTY. I HAD IT RELACED. IN FEB. 2011 IT WENT OUT AGAIN. THE PART WAS COVERED UNDER THE 1 YEAR WARRENTY BUT SINCE I DRIVE FOR A LIVING FORD WOULD NOT COVER IT BEAUSE OF THE MILES. THATS ANOTHER PROBLEM THAT SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO. I LOOKED ON THE INTERNET AND FOUND THAT THERE WERE NUMEROUS TIMES THE OWNERS WERE HAVING THE SAME PROBLEM WITH THIS UNIT. MY COMPLAINT IS THIS IS A PART THAT SHOULD NEVER GO BAD IN A 2 YR. TIME FRAME THEN GO BAD AGIN IN LESS THAN A YEAR. WHATS GOING ON HERE? *TT

THE DRIVERS SIDE SEAT BELT FAILED TO LATCH, THE BUCKLE WOULD NOT GO INTO THE RECEIVER. WE TOOK IT TO LAWRENCE HALL LINCOLN MERCURY DEALERSHIP WHERE WE PURCHASED THE CAR NEW. THE TECH. SHOWED US HOW TO USE A SCREWDRIVER TO LATCH AND UNLATCH THE BELT. HE ORDER THE PART, WE TOOK THE CAR TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THE DISCOVERED IT WAS THE WRONG PART. THEY REORDERED THE PART AND DISCOVERED IT WAS STILL THE WRONG PART. THEY WANT US TO KEEP USING THE SCREWDRIVER. I FEEL THIS IS UNSAFE AND IF THIS IS A PROBLEM THEN THE DEPT. SHOULD KNOW ABOUT IT. WE ARE REQUIRED TO WEAR THE BELTS THEN IF THE BREAK IT SHOULD NOT TAKE 2 WEEKS TO FIX.