2004 TOYOTA RX300 Complaints

CLAIM SDVIK110 THE INCIDENT WHICH OCCURRED ON APRIL 19TH OF 2018, OCCURRED WHEN HERTZ CORPORATION MADE REMARKS THAT WERE NOT ONLY SLANDEROUS BUT DEFAMING TO THE PLAINTIFF, [XXX] NAME AND REPUTATION. HERTZ CORPORATION ALLEGE THAT THE PLAINTIFF COMMITTED THE CRIME OF THEFT, WHICH IS A FELONY CRIMINAL OFFENSE. THIS CRIME IS PUNISHABLE BY IMPRISONMENT. HERTZ CORPORATION HAS CLAIMED THAT THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT RETURN A RENTAL VEHICLE IN THE TIME REQUIRED, PER THE TERMS OF THE WRITTEN CONTRACT. THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE GIVEN THAT [XXX] RETURNED TO THIS VEHICLE TO THE AGREED LOCATION, EVEN PRIOR TO THE DATE AND TIME THAT IT WAS DUE TO BE DELIVERED. [XXX] HAS PROVIDED THIS OFFICE WITH EVIDENCE THAT WILL PROVE THAT SHE DID IN FACT RETURN THE VEHICLE TO 3. PRIOR TO LEAVING THE HERTZ LOT WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS ORIGINALLY RENTED, (3851 EL CAJON BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92105) AN INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED ON THIS VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE INSPECTION CONSISTED OF CHECKING THE EXTERIOR FOR PHYSICAL DAMAGE AND INTERIOR FOR PHYSICAL DAMAGE. IT WAS DURING THIS TIME THAT THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR HERTZ AND [XXX] NOTED VISIBLE EXTERIOR DAMAGE TO THE VEHICLE. BOTH THE REPRESENTATIVE AND PLAINTIFF TOOK PHOTOGRAPHS AND HAVE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION OF THE DAMAGE NOTED TO THE VEHICLE PRIOR TO RENTAL. IT WAS ALSO DURING THE RENTAL OF THIS VEHICLE, [XXX] MADE ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT THE CORPORATE OFFICE AND REPORT THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS IN UNSAFE CONDITION. THIS IS A VEHICLE THAT IN REGARDS TO THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, THIS VEHICLE WOULD BE DEEMED AS UNSAFE FOR THE ROADWAYS. THE HERTZ CORPORATION REFUSE TO PROVIDE [XXX] WITH AN ALTERNATE OR ALTERNATIVE VEHICLE THAT WAS SAFE FOR THE ROADWAY AND REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT [XXX] DID NOT FEEL SAFE AND THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS A DANGER TO NOT ONLY HERSELF, BUT OTHERS ON THE ROADWAY. 4. [XXX] WAS MALICIOUSLY ACCUSED OF NOT ONLY DAMAGING THIS VEHICLE DURING ITS TIME OF RENTAL, BUT THEN NEVER RETURNING IT INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA

WE BOUGHT OUR BRAND NEW 2017 TOYOTA CAMRY SE, 4 WEEKS AGO, IT SHAKES VIOLENTLY DURING NORMAL DRIVING SPEEDS & FREEWAY SPEEDS. OUR BRAND NEW CAR'S ALL 4 BRIDGESTONE TIRES WERE REPLACED 2 WEEK'S AGO AND THE PROBLEM HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORST EVEN WITH NEW TIRES. THE DEALERSHIP TOOK ANOTHER BRAND NEW CAR FROM THE LOT AND IT HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. WE'VE TESTED 3 OTHER CARS WITH MICHELIN & BRIDGESTONE TIRES AND THEY ALL SHAKE. THE DEALERSHIP HAS VALIDATED THAT THE CARS ARE SHAKING BUT HAS FAILED TO FIX THE PROBLEM. IN THE LAST 4 WEEKS SINCE WE PURCHASED THE CAR THE CAR'S BEEN IN THE SHOP THE LAST TWO WEEKS - AND IS STILL IN THE SHOP. IT MAKES ME DIZZY DRIVING THE CAR. FOR ME THIS IS AT MINIMUM A SAFETY ISSUE AND NOW CAUSING HEALTH PROBLEMS. TOYOTANATION WEBSITE SHOWS MANY OTHER OWNERS WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. HTTP://WWW.TOYOTANATION.COM/FORUM/310-7TH-GENERATION-2012/1200698-2015-2016-CAMRY-VIBRATIONS-SHUDDER.HTML PLEASE HELP! *TR

I AM NOT SURE I AM USING THIS FORM CORRECTLY, IT WOULD BE NICE TO GET A CONFIRMATION EMAIL. MY COMPLAINT IS ABOUT THE NEW NAVIGATION SYSTEM BEING INSTALLED ON THE NEW TOYOTAS. I BOUGHT A 2016 AND DISCOVERED THEY ARE MAKING US USE A NAVIGATION SYSTEM CALLED SCOUT GPS THAT REQUIRES THE DRIVER TO FOCUS ON A LIST OF DIRECTIONS ON A SMALL SCREEN FOR DETAILS WHILE DRIVING. WHILE DRIVING WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ENTER DATA FOR SAFETY REASONS BUT THIS NEW SYSTEM DOES THIS IN THE OPPOSITE BY REQUIRING THE DRIVER TO ATTEMPT TO FOLLOW A LIST OF WRITTEN DIRECTIONS WHILE DRIVING. THE MAP FUNCTION WHICH WAS LARGE ON PREVIOUS NAV SYSTEMS IS NOW REDUCED TO A SMALL SIZE AND LINES OF TEXT REPLACE THE EASY TO USE MAP. THIS NEW NAV SYSTEM IS AS DANGEROUS AS TEXTING AND TALKING WHILE DRIVING. THE LATER FIELDS ON THIS FORM DO NOT QUITE OFFER A TRUE WAY TO FILE MY COMPLAINT SO SOME OF IT MAY NOT BE RIGHT.

I HAD A ONE CAR ACCIDENT & THE AIR BAGS ON THE SIDE OF THE DRIVERS DOOR INJURED BOTH OF MY LEGS. MY LEFT LEG HAD THE INSIDE CUT TO THE BONE & SKIN RIPPED OFF, COULD NOT WALK FOR 8 WEEKS, HAD PLASTIC SURGERY. LARGE INDENTED SCAR NOW WITH SWELLING OF LEG, OTHERWISE LEG WORKS FINE. MY RIGHT LEG HAS A LARGE HEMATOMA WITH SWELLING, NO BROKEN SKIN. THE PARAMEDICS FELT IT WAS THE AIR BAGS THAT CAUSED THE PROBLEM.. CAR WAS TOTALED, MAKE IS 2007 CAMRY, COMPUTER WOULD NOT ALLOW ME TO PUT IN MAKE OF CAR.

2006 LEXUS RX330 DASHBOARD CRACKING I'M AFRAID THAT THE PASSENGER AIRBAGS ARE GOING TO COME OUT. *TR

TOYOTA PRIUS (2008) HATCH RELEASE RUBBER COVER PIECE DETACHED AND TORE APART. NOTE THAT MY RX300 SELECTION OF MAKE/PART NUMBER IS BOGUS, AS I HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING WHO MADE THIS RUBBER COMPONENT. *TR

I TOOK MY 2004 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER V6 TO LONGO TOYOTA FOR BRAKE BOOSTER RECALL IN NOVEMBER 2010. THEY KEPT MY CAR NEARLY 7 WEEKS BEFORE REPAIR WAS COMPLETED. A FEW DAYS AFTER PICKING UP MY VEHICLE, WHILE I WAS PARKED DROPPING OFF MY PASSENGER, MOST OF THE CONTROL PANEL LIGHTS ILLUMINATED (BRAKES, ABS, TRAC OFF, VSC, CHECK ENGINE). I REPORTED THIS TO THE DEALER. THEY SAID TO BRING THE CAR BACK. I TOOK THE CAR BACK AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTS WERE RUN AND CONCLUDED THAT A CODE WAS STORED BUT IT WAS NOTHING SPECIFIC THAT HAD FAILED. BRAKE SYSTEM WAS BLED. IN JUNE 2011, THE LIGHT CLUSTER ("CHRISTMAS TREE" IS HOW THE DEALER REFERS TO IT) ILLUMINATED AGAIN WHILE I WAS ATTEMPTING TO PICK UP MY CAR FROM MY LOCAL TOYOTA DEALER (BOB SMITH TOYOTA). AGAIN, THE CAR WAS LEFT. AGAIN IT WAS REPORTED TO ME THAT THE SYSTEM HAD STORED A CODE BUT NO SPECIFIC COMPONENT WAS IN FAILURE AND THE BRAKES WERE BLED. APPROXIMATELY, JULY 20, 2011 AND JULY 23, 2011, THE LIGHTS ILLUMINATED AGAIN, ONLY FOUR OF THEM (TRAC OFF, VSC, ABS, BRAKES). I CONTACTED THE TOYOTA DEALER ON TUESDAY, JULY 26 AND WAS FORCING THE ISSUE ON JULY 29, 2011 AND MADE AN APPOINTMENT FOR AUGUST 1, 2011. ON JULY 31, 2011, THE SAME FOUR LIGHTS ILLUMINATED WHILE DRIVING AND STAYED ON. I STOPPED, TURNED OFF THE ENGINE, RESTARTED THE VEHICLE, AND EXPERIENCED A VERY SPONGY, SQUISHY BRAKE PEDAL. I CONTACTED TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION TO FURTHER ADDRESS THE CONCERN OF MY VEHICLE NOW BEING UNSAFE AS A RESULT OF THEIR RECALL. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION WAS VAGUE AND SAID THAT THE MATTER COULD ONLY BE ADDRESSED BY LONGO TOYOTA, THE DEALER THAT PERFORMED THE RECALL, SINCE THE PARTS WARRANTY WOULD ONLY BE WITH THEM. IN CONTACTING BOB SMITH TOYOTA, THE SERVICE ADVISORS SWEARS THAT THE PROBLEM CAN BE RESOLVED BY THEM. IT APPEARS THAT PERFORMING THE RECALL WEAKENED THE INTEGRITY OF MY BRAKE SYSTEM. AS ONE REPRESENTATIVE SAID, "YOU WILL NOT HAVE A CATASTROPHIC FAILURE AND YOU WILL STILL BE ABLE TO STOP. IT WILL JUST TAKE LONGER." *KB

TOYOTA RAV4 MAKES POPPING AND CLUNKING NOISE WHEN STEERING WHEEL IS TURNED. THIS IS DUE TO LOOSENESS IN THE INTERMEDIATE SHAFT SPLINES AND JOINTS (TOTAL COST:$468; PART NUMBERS 45221-42071 [STEERING INTERMEDIATE SHAFT] AND 45260-42090 [STEERING SHAFT ASSEMBLY]). THIS IS A POTENTIAL SAFETY HAZARD AND TOYOTA REFUSES TO ISSUE A RECALL. IT IS A PRODUCT DEFECT IN STEERING INTERMEDIATE SHAFT AS EVIDENT BY THE TSB ISSUED BY TOYOTA. *TR

OUR 2005 TOYOTA SIENNA TOOK OFF ON US IN RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC. MOVING MY FOOT TO THE BRAKE AND MY HUSBAND SHIFTING INTO NEUTRAL WAS THE FIRST THING WE TRIED, WE ALSO TRIED PARK AND REVERSE, AND TURNING OFF THE CRUISE CONTROL, NONE OF WHICH WORKED. THE TOYOTA SIENNA DEATH TRAP CONTINUED TO ACCELERATE RAPIDLY EVEN THOUGH MY FOOT WAS JAMMED ON THE BRAKE (I DIDN'T REMOVE MY FOOT FROM THE BRAKE FOR ANOTHER 2 1/2 HRS UNTIL THE TOW TRUCK PULLED IN FRONT OF US. BY THE WAY, WHEN YOUR VEHICLE IS SUDDENLY TRAVELING MUCH, MUCH FASTER THAN ANYONE ELSE'S VEHICLE ON THE ROAD, IT'S ALL YOU CAN DO TO NOT HIT SOMEONE. BELIEVE ME, I WAS SUDDENLY SWERVING IN AND OUT OF THE LANES AND CUTTING EVERYONE OFF. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPPED OUR TOYOTA DEATH TRAP WAS PULLING THE KEY FROM THE IGNITION, CERTAINLY NOT IDEAL IN RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC. WHILE THIS WAS GOING ON, OUR SON WAS IN THE BACKSEAT CALLING 911, WHILE OUR DAUGHTER CRIED. WE DON'T HAVE A LAWYER AND TOYOTA WON'T FIX OUR VAN. WHAT ARE WE SUPPOSED TO DO WITH IT? *TR

OWNER OF 2008 LEXUS ES RECEIVED RECALL NOTICE FOR ISSUE WITH SUDDEN ACCELERATION. CAR WAS TAKEN TO LEXUS SERVICE DEPT FOR REPAIRS. HOWEVER A MONTH OR SO LATER, THE CAR SUDDENLY ACCELERATED GETTING UP TO SPEED OF APPROX 70 MPH IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. BRAKES DID NOT STOP OR SLOW CAR DOWN. AS A RESULT, TWO PARKED CARS WERE HIT, AND DAMAGED RESIDENTS YARDS BEFORE RUNNING HEAD ON INTO A TREE IN SOMEONE'S YARD. THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER WERE INJURED. *TR