2003 ACURA TL Complaints

INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) ACURA 2003 3.2TL COMMON TRANSMISSION FAILURE CODES PO740 AND PO730. SHIFTS ERRATICALLY LIKE MILLIONS OF OTHERS. VIN # IS NOT ON THE LIST. WE HAVE LEARNED THIS IS THE 2ND TIME IN. HONDA CITY IN WISCONSIN - DEALER SCAMMED US. CARFAX DID NOT LIST THE REPAIR!!! DEALER IS TELLING US TO DRIVE IT IN AND RISK OUR LIVES!!! !!! THE DEALER SHOULD DRIVE IT HIMSELF. HONDA CORPORATE IS NOT TAKING ANY ACTION. 1-800-422-2872 AMANDA CASE # [XXX] . WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT NOT TAKING ACTION !!! *TR

WAS TRAVELING ON I-20 WITH FAMILY AND TRANSMISSION IN 2003 ACURA TYPE S JUST BLEW OUT WITH NO WARNING TRAVELING SEVENTY MILES AN HOUR. COASTED TO SIDE OF INTERSTATE AND HAD TO GET OUT AND PUSH CAR FURTHER OUT OF HARMS WAY. HOT TRANSMISSION FLUID CREATED SMOKE FROM ENGINE COMPARTMENT AND LEFT US STRANDED SIXTY MILES FROM HOME. NEW TRANSMISSION WAS INSTALLED IN THIS VEHICLE IN 2007 AT DEALERSHIP WITH 50,000 MILES ON IT AND NOW IT GOES OUT AGAIN WITH ABOUT 50,000 MILES ON IT. DEALER WOULD ONLY GIVE TEN PERCENT TOWARDS GOODWILL FIX PAID THIRTY TWO HUNDRED OUT OF POCKET. THIS YEAR AND MODEL WAS INVOLVED IN A LAWSUIT IN CALIFORNIA BUT THE VIN NUMBER ON MY CAR AS WELL AS NUMEROUS OTHERS WAS NOT INCLUDED BUT SHOULD WELL HAVE BEEN. ACURA SERVICE MANAGER TOLD ME THIS IS A WEAK PRODUCT BUT THAT WAS PUTTING IT MILDLY AFTER GETTING ON THE INTERNET AND READING ALL THE CONSUMER COMPLAINTS ON THIS EXACT MODEL AND YEAR ACROSS THE COUNTRY. THESE TRANSMISSIONS ARE STILL DEFECTIVE AND SHOULD BE REPLACE BY HONDA FOR FREE. CONSUMERS ARE TRADING AND GETTING RID OF THE CARS BECAUSE THEY FEEL THEY ARE A SAFETY THREAT TO THEIR FAMILY. MY DAUGHTER WAS DRIVING US TO A GRADUATION WHEN THIS HAPPENED AND IT SCARED HER TO DEATH HAPPENING AT THAT SPEED ON THE INTERSTATE. THIS PRODUCT IS WELL DOCUMENTED AS BEING A PIECE OF CRAP BUT CONSUMERS LIKE ME HAVE NO RECOURSE BUT SUFFER THE LOSS AND HOPE FOR THE BEST OUT OF THE NEXT TRANSMISSION. WHEN PEOPLE HAVE TO PUT THREE AND FOUR TRANSMISSIONS IN A CAR WITH A HUNDRED THOUSAND MILES ON IT SOMEBODY NEEDS TO STEP IN AND PROTECT THE CONSUMERS. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT DIFFERENCE WAS MADE DURING THE VIN NUMBER ON MY CAR AND SAME MODELS BEFORE IT THAT WERE COVERED UNDER THE LAWSUIT. EVIDENTLY THE SAME TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS STILL EXISTED IN ALL THESE MODELS. JUST READ ALL THE THREADS ON WWW.CARSURVEY.ORG/REVIEWS/ACURA/TL/R71264/COMMENTS. *TR

THERE WAS A SUDDEN DOWNSHIFT IN GEARS WHILE DRIVING IN THE VEHICLE AND CHANGING FREEWAYS LATE AT NIGHT. THE CAR, AS A RESULT, DECELERATED QUICKLY IN FAST MOVING TRAFFIC ALMOST CAUSING AN ACCIDENT. THE CAR WAS PULLED OVER TO THE SIDE OF THE FREEWAY AND WAS RENDERED INOPERABLE DUE TO TRANSMISSION FAILURE. THE CAR WAS PART OF THE ACURA 00-04 CL & TL A/T RECALL (AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION SECOND GEAR INSPECTION). AS PART OF THE RECALL, IF THE CAR WAS OVER 15,000 MILES, THE DEALER WOULD INSPECT THE GEAR FOR HEAT DISCOLORATION. IF THEY FOUND DISCOLORATION, A NEW TRANSMISSION WOULD BE INSTALLED. THE CAR WAS OVER 15,000 MILES AT THE TIME BUT THE DEALER REPORTED NO DISCOLORATION. AS A RESULT, ONLY AN OIL JET KIT WAS INSTALLED ONLY. DUE TO A LARGE NUMBER OF CASES OF TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS WITH THE TL AND A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT, ACURA EXTENDED THEIR TRANSMISSION WARRANTY FOR MODEL YEARS 1999-2002 AND INCLUDED ONLY SOME 2003 DEPENDING ON VIN NUMBER. MY VEHICLE IS A 2003 MODEL, BUT DID NOT FALL WITHIN THE VIN NUMBER CUTOFF. THEREFORE, MY CAR DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THE TRANSMISSION EXTENDED WARRANTY. I HAVE A FOUND A LARGE NUMBER OF OTHER COMPLAINTS ON THIS WEBSITE, AS WELL AS OTHERS, REGARDING 2003 ACURA TLS THAT DID NOT MAKE THE VIN NUMBER CUTOFF BUT STILL SUFFERED FROM TRANSMISSION FAILURE. OBVIOUSLY, THERE IS A SAFETY ISSUE REGARDING THESE CARS AND THEIR TRANSMISSIONS THAT WAS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE INITIAL RECALL. (THE APPROPRIATE REPAIRS WERE NOT MADE). THE SECOND RECALL, WITH THE EXTENDED WARRANTY, ALSO DOES NOT APPEAR TO COVER ALL VEHICLES EFFECTED BY THIS TRANSMISSION PROBLEM. *TR

MY 2003 ACURA TL-S TRANSMISSION, 83,000 MILES. BASED ON THE RESEARCH I'VE DONE ONLINE. IT SEEMS THAT THERE ARE MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH THIS MODEL. *TR

I OWN A 2003 ACURA 3.2TL, THE TRANSMISSION FAILED WHILE I WAS DRIVING IT HOME THE OTHER DAY. I ALMOST CAUSED A MAJOR ACCIDENT ON THE HIGHWAY I WAS TRAVELING ON. IF IT WASN'T FOR THE OTHER DRIVER ON THE ROAD I WOULD HAVE BEEN IN A SERIOUS ACCIDENT. AFTER FINDING THOUSANDS OF ACURA TL OWNERS ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED THE SAME. I THINK IT ONLY FAIR TO HAVE THIS MATER INVESTIGATED BY YOUR COMPANY. ACURA NEEDS TO ACCEPT THAT THEY DESIGNED A POORLY FUNCTIONAL TRANSMISSION THAT SHOULD BE REPLACED REGARDLESS OF VEHICLE MILEAGE. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 ACURA TL. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATE SPEEDS OF 60 MPH, THE VEHICLE SHIFTED FROM DRIVE TO NEUTRAL WITHOUT DRIVER INTENT, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO STALL. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND TESTING. THE DEALER ADVISED THE TRANSMISSION WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE DEALER WOULD NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 72,000.

INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) 2003 ACURA TL 3.2, [XXX] MILEAGE: 55,189 AFTER DRIVING FOR A FEW MINUTES, AUTO TRANSMISSION DOES NOT PULL, SIMILAR TO THE TRANSMISSION BEING PLACED IN "NEUTRAL". ACURA TAKEN TO LEITH ACURA, CARY, NC ON 4/14/10. DEALER SERVICE DEPT IDENTIFIED THE FOLLOWING COMPUTER CODES: P0740-TORQUE CONVERTER CLUTCH, P0730-GEAR INCORRECT RATIO, & P0700-SHIFT MALFUNCTION. BASED ON THESE CODES, DEALER RECOMMENDED TRANSMISSION & TORQUE CONVERTER TO BE REPLACED (TOTAL COST APPROX $ 3400). DEALER CONTACTED THE REGIONAL ACURA OFFICE, WHICH PROVIDED A 45% ADJUSTMENT TO THE ORIGINAL COST. NET CHARGE BY DEALER $ 1,783.19. THIS VEHICLE WAS SUBJECT TO A RECALL IN 2003-04 (NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID # 04V176000). THE MODIFICATION TO THIS SAFETY RECALL WAS COMPLETED ON 9/10/2004 BY TISCHER ACURA, LAUREL, MD WITH MILEAGE @ 8,426. PER THE INVOICE FROM TISCHER & SINCE THE MILEAGE WAS LESS THAN 15,000, THE RECALL INSTRUCTED THE DEALER TO "INSTALL AN OIL JET KIT", WHICH WAS COMPLETED. NOTE, IF THE VEHICLE HAD MORE THAN 15,000 MILES, THE SAFETY RECALL INSTRUCTED THE DEALER TO "REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION". BASED UPON THE HISTORY OF THIS PARTICULAR ACURA, I BELIEVE THE DEALER IN 2004 SHOULD HAVE REPLACED THE TRANSMISSION INSTEAD OF INSTALLING AN OIL JET KIT. MANY ACURAS MANUFACTURED PRIOR TO THE 2004 MODEL HAD SERIOUS "TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS" WHICH WERE INCLUDED IN OTHER "RECALLS". *TR

LTR REGARDING PROBLEMS SHE IS EXPERIENCING WITH HER 2003 ACURA 3.2TL. SHE WOULD LIKE A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION INTO THIS MATTER. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE WOULD HESITATE WHEN ACCELERATING. ON AUGUST 14, 2009, THE VEHICLE STALLED. THE CONSUMER WAS ABLE TO GET THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER. THE PROBLEM WAS THOUGHT TO BE THE BATTERY AND TIMING BELT AND THE CONSUMER WAS CHARGED $ 1,371.49. ON DECEMBER 12, THE VEHICLE STARTED JERKING INTO GEAR. THE VEHICLE WAS DROPPED OFF AT THE DEALER. THE CONSUMER RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE DEALER STATING THE VEHICLE NEEDED A NEW TRANSMISSION. *JB

COMPLETE FAILURE OF THE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION IN MY 2003 ACURA TL 3.2 WITH ONLY 70,000 MILES. *DT

2003ACURATL 4 DOOR. THE PASSENGER AIRBAG LIGHT COME AT DIFFERENT TIMES WHEN DRIVING THE CAR WITH SOMEONE IN THE SEAT. THE GAS PEDAL ALSO IS STARTING TO STICK AND HARD TO PUSH DOWN TO MOVE THE CAR FORWARD. COULD THERE BE A RECALL MAYBE A INVESTIGATION. *TR