2014 CADILLAC ATS Complaints

THE FRONT COLLISION WARNING/AUTO BRAKING FEATURE MALFUNCTIONED AT 45MPH AND FLASHED COLLISION WARNING IN HUD AND SLAMMED ON THE BRAKES FULL FORCE WITH NO OBJECTS/CARS ANYWHERE NEAR THE VEHICLE. IF SOMEONE HAD BEEN BEHIND US THE CAR WOULD HAVE HIT US. *JS

INTERMITTENT ELECTRIC POWER STEERING ASSIST FAILURES. FAILURES SEEM TO OCCUR MOST OFTEN WHEN THE CAR IS COLD AND BACKING OUT OF DRIVE WAY OR PARKING SPACES. POWER STEERING WILL WORK FOR A VERY SHORT PERIOD THEN FAIL LEAVING TYPICALLY WHEN IN THE MIDDLE OF A BACKING MANEUVER WHEN LEAVING MY DRIVE AND ENTERING TRAFFIC. TURNING CAR OFF AND RESTARTING WILL RESET THE ELECTRIC POWER STEERING ASSIST. THIS IS PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS IN CROWDED PARKING AREAS WHEN I NEED TO TURN THE CAR OFF AND RESTART WHILE BLOCKING TRAFFIC. THE FREQUENCY SEEMS TO BE INCREASING FOR THE FAILURES BUT DEALER DOES NOT SEEM TO BE ABLE TO REPRODUCE.

STATED RECALL WAS TO "REPAIR" THE AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF OF THE REAR WINDOW DEFOGGER/DEFROSTER. IT WAS SUPPOSEDLY RESOLVED BY DEACTIVATING THE SHUT OFF MECHANISM. SUPPOSEDLY, IF THE AUTOMATIC SHUT-OFF DID NOT ACTIVATE, THE CONTACTS COULD FAIL AND THERE COULD BE A FIRE. MY CONCERN IS WHAT HAPPENS NOW IF I FORGET TO SHUT OFF THE DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER. IN THE MANUAL IT SAYS THE SYSTEM WAS TIMED FOR A SET TIME, THEN WOULD SHUT OFF. THEN THE AUTOMATIC CONTROL SUPPOSEDLY WOULD TURN THE DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER BACK ON BUT FOR A SHORTER INTERVAL. TO ME THAT MEANS, THE TIME FACTOR IS IMPORTANT AND PROBABLY WAS THERE TO PREVENT A FIRE. MY CONTACT WITH GM'S SERVICE CENTER HAD A NUMBER OF REQUESTS IN PRIORITY ORDER. THOSE FURTHER DOWN MY LIST WERE WILD IDEAS TO PUT MY MIND TOTALLY AT REST ABOUT DRIVING SUCH A CAR. NONE OF MY REQUESTS WERE GRANTED. BELOW ARE IN PRIORITY ORDER WHAT I REQUESTED. !. PERSONS WHO BROUGHT IN THE CAR FOR THE RECALL SHOULD BE REMINDED THAT THE SYSTEM WAS NO LONGER AUTOMATIC AND THEY SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF THE NEED TO SHUT OFF THE SYSTEM. 2. A CARD OR MEMORY STIMULATING DECAL BE PROVIDED TO SERVE AS A REMINDER TO SHUT OFF THE "AUTOMATIC SYSTEM". 3. THAT GM PROVIDE ASSURANCES TO OWNERS THAT THIS WORK AROUND SYSTEM WAS AN EFFECTIVE WAY OR RESOLVING THE PROBLEM AND NOT CAUSE A POTENTIAL FIRE. NOW MY SELFISH REQUESTS. 4. GM GUARANTEE ME THAT IF A FIRE DID OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THIS ISSUE THEY WOULD COVER ALL REPAIRS. 5. MOST SELFISH: GM ALLOW ME TO OPT OUT OF MY LEASE SO I DIDN'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE WHOLE ISSUE. (I KNOW THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN, BUT I THOUGHT IT WOULD EXERT SOME PRESSURE TO GET THE TOP ONES DONE AT LEAST

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2014 CADILLAC ATS. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V558000 (VISIBILITY) HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE.

MY 2014 CADILLAC ATS WAS RECALLED DUE TO FAULTY AUTO REAR WINDOW DEFOGGER. I TOOK MY VEHICLE TO LOCAL CADILLAC DEALER AND THEY DISCONNECTED THE AUTO DEFOGGER. THEY SAID THAT THIS WAS THE FIX ORDERED BY GM. I CAN NOW OPERATE MY REAR DEFOGGER MANUALLY ONLY. MY AUTO OPTION NO LONGER WORKS. I CALLED GM TO SEE IF THEY WOULD REIMBURSE ME FOR TAKING AWAY MY USE OF THIS FEATURE IN MY CAR. THEY SAID THEY WOULD NOT. GM STATED THAT THIS WAS A PERMANENT FIX FOR THIS FAULTY FEATURE WAS TO DISCONNECT IT. SO IF YOU CAN LOOK INTO THIS MATTER IF WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. GM SHOULD REPAIR THE FAULTY PART OR REIMBURSE ALL WHO ARE AFFECTED BY THIS RECALL.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2014 CADILLAC ATS. WHILE IDLING, THE VEHICLE'S BACK-UP CAMERA FLICKERED ON AND OFF AND THE FRONT DRIVER SIDE SEAT FRACTURED. THE FAILURE RECURRED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED OR DIAGNOSED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 2,662.

I DISCOVERED WHILE MY CAR WAS PARKED IN THE GARAGE THAT THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE HAD A PROTRUDING SIDEWALL NEXT TO THE RIM, WITH ABOUT A 4-INCH SPLIT AND EXPOSED STEEL BELT. ON THE SAME DAY I HAD THE TIRE REPLACED FOR $293.61. WITHIN THE NEXT WEEK I DISCOVERED THAT ALL OF THE OTHER THREE TIRES BEGAN SHOWING PROTRUDING SIDEWALLS. NOTE THAT THE ELECTRONIC INFLATION HISTORY SHOWS NO SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION FROM NORMAL PRESSURES. THERE WERE NO CRASHES INVOLVING THE VEHICLE. ALL 4 TIRES WERE THE ORIGINALS FROM THE GM FACTORY. NEITHER CADILLAC, WHERE THE FIRST TIRE WAS REPLACED, NOR MICHELIN, THE MANUFACTURER, OFFER ANY WARRANTY OR CREDIT TOWARD REPLACEMENT OF ANY OF THE FOUR TIRES. THESE TIRES APPEAR TO BE DEFECTIVE WITH THE POTENTIAL SAFETY ISSUE FOR SUDDEN BLOWOUT. THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY EXTERNAL CAUSE FOR THIS DEFECT TO OCCUR AT ONLY 10,000 MILES. THE MICHELIN MODEL # IS 225/40R18. MY LOCAL CADILLAC SERVICE MANAGER HAS STATED THAT THIS HAS BEEN REPORTED TO GM, AND THEY WILL NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY.

I CALLED THE DEALERSHIP (KATHERINE COLE WHO SOLD US THE RUN FLAT TIRES), TWEETED GM. NO ONE AT THIS POINT HAS BEEN THE LEAST BIT INTERESTED IN WHAT I HAD I TO SAY. AFTER MY CRASH, ON AUGUST 11, 2014, I HAVE FOUND SEVERAL OTHER ATS OWNERS THAT EXPERIENCE THE SAME EXACT ISSUE..MY DAUGHTER AND I SUFFERED TERRIBLE INJURIES, CRASH AND TOTALED MY CAR. I ALSO AM FINDING THAT THERE MAYBE A TIRE ISSUE BECAUSE OF FAST WEAR AFTER ONLY 7,000 MILES. WHAT, IS GM OR THE TIRE MANUFACTURE OR THESE SAFETY ORG. WAITING FOR SOMEONE TO DIE? I SENT IN A COMPLAINT IN ABOUT MY 2014 CADILLAC ATS CAUSING ME TO HAVE A NEAR FATAL CAR ACCIDENT. GM IS CLAIMING THAT THE TIRES WERE WORN AND SPEED CAUSED THE ACCIDENT, WHICH IS FALSE. MY CAR ONLY HAD 7500 MILES ( CAR WAS PURCHASED WITH ONLY 256 MILES) AND THE TIRES WERE NOT WORN! THE CAR WAS JUST IN FOR SERVICE FOR IT?S PREMIUM CARE LEASE MAINTENANCE, THE SERVICE ADVISOR WOULD HAVE MENTIONED THAT AT TIME! THE SPEED WAS CAUSED FROM THE ACCIDENT. MY DAUGHTERS ABDOMEN WAS INJURED FROM THE SEAT BELT TOO! BETWEEN GM AND MICHELIN TIRES I AM GETTING NO WHERE, THEY ARE POINTING THE FINGER TO EACH OTHER WHEN I VOTED FOR YOU I THOUGHT YOU WOULD FIGHT FOR MICHIGANDERS! HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF I WERE YOUR FAMILY MEMBER. I HAVE BEEN FOUR SURGERIES AND AT LEAST TWO MORE, PLEASE RETHINK YOUR DECISION PLEASE HELP ME. UPDATED 10/9/15 *LN MA 10/29/2015 *CN

THE ENGINE STALLS WHILE DRIVING, WITH OUT ANY ALERT. IT HAS STALLED ON THREE DIFFERENT DATES SINCE I LEASED THE VEHICLE. *TR

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