1986 CHEVROLET CAMARO Complaints

WHILE DRIVING THE VEHICLE CAUGHT ON FIRE IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT. CAUSE WAS NOT DETERMINED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. *AK

THE CASING WHERE THE SEAT BELT IS SECURED/LOCKED BROKE PRIOR TO/AFTER RECALL REPAIRS. MANUFACTURER SAID THAT THERE IS A WARRANTY ON RECALL, AND THAT THIS WARRANTY HAD EXPIRED. (90V-105). *AK

DEALER IS CHARGING CONSUMER FOR REPLACING THE SEAT BELT BECAUSE THE RELEASE BUTTON BROKE AND THEY CLAIMED THAT IT WAS NOT PART OF THE RECALL. CONSUMER THINKS THAT THE DEALER SHOULD PAY OR REPLACE THE SEAT BECAUSE HE FEELS LIKE THIS IS A SAFETY DEFECT. *AK

OWNER STATES THAT SHE HAS PROBLEMS WITH ONE FRONT AND REAR SAFETY BELT, AND THAT THERE WAS A RECALL FOR THE SEAT BELTS. OWNER ALSO NOTED THAT HER BELTS BROKE, BUT HER VEHICLE WAS NOT INDENTFIED AS AN AFFECTED MODEL. *AK

THE PASSENGER FRONT SEATBELT IS NOT LATCHING AND IF IT IS LATCHED IT WILL NOT UNLATCH. PLEASE DESCRIBE. TT

THE FRONT DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE SEAT BELT BUCKLE SEAT BELT WILL NOT LATCH . TT

BOTH FRONT SEAT BELTS ONCE FASTENED COULD NOT BE UNFASTENED, CAUSING THE OCCUPANT TO BE TRAPPED, AND ON OCCASION THEY TEND TO POP OPEN. TT

DESIGN OF EMERGENCY BRAKE SYSTEM FAILS TO ALLOW BRAKES TO ADJUST TO MEET SAFETY STANDARDS FOR NEW JERSEY STATE INSPECTION. *SKD

THE SEAT BELT BUCKLE ON THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE WHEN CONSUMER BUCKLES UP REMAINS LOCKED AND SHE COULDN'T IT GET LOOSE. TT