2004 CHEVROLET SILVERADO Complaints

2004 CHEVROLET SILVERADO STALLED WHILE DRIVING AT 21000 MILES. *TS WHEN THE VEHICLE STALLED, THE DASH READ "REDUCED ENGINE POWER." THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT RE-START, STEERING AND THE BRAKING WAS LIMITED. THE VEHICLE FINALLY RESTARTED BUT THERE WAS NO POWER, THE VEHICLE IDLED ROUGHLY AND WOULD NOT TRAVEL ABOVE 3-5 MILES PER HOUR. THE VEHICLE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A THROTTLE ACTUATOR CODE. THE THROTTLE ACTUATOR WAS REPLACED. *SC

DT: THE CONTACT STATED VEHICLE WOULD NOT GO INTO PARK. HE THOUGHT HE HAD PUT THE CAR INTO PARK BUT WHEN HE BEGAN TO EXIT THE VEHICLE IT STARTED MOVING. WHEN HE LOOKED AT THE SHIFT INDICATOR IT WAS IN REVERSE. HE CHECKED TO SEE IF THERE WAS SOMETHING LODGED IN THE COLUMN SHIFT. THE CONTACT SAID HE DID NOT FIND ANYTHING LODGED IN THE COLUMN SHIFT. AT THIS POINT THE VEHICLE WOULD ONLY GO INTO REVERSE. BUT, YESTERDAY WHEN HE WAS INSPECTING THE VEHICLE NOTICED IT WOULD ONLY GO INTO FIRST AND SECOND GEARS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN INSPECTED BY A DEALER TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. *AK

2004 CHEVROLET SILVERADO STALLED, AND DIED, THE ENGINE WARNING LIGHT CAME ON, AND THE MESSAGE CENTER ON THE DASH READ " REDUCED ENGINE POWER". *TS THE TRUCK WOULD NOT RESTART AND STEERING AND BRAKING WAS LIMITED. THE CONSUMER PULLED OFF THE ROAD AND CHECKED UNDER THE HOOD FOR SIGNS OF FAILURE, NONE WERE FOUND. THE VEHICLE AS RESTARTED BUT IT HAD NO POWER, IDLED ROUGHLY AND WOULD GO NO FASTER THAN 3-5 MPH. THIS PROBLEM RECURRED TWO MORE TIMES. THE PROBLEM WAS DIAGNOSED AT THE DEALER WITH A THROTTLE ACTUATOR CODE, THE THROTTLE WAS REPLACED. THE DEALER BELIEVED THE PROBLEM WAS WITH THE FUEL PUMP MODULE BECAUSE HE HAD REPLACED SEVERAL ON SIMILAR VEHICLE, BUT SINCE THE CODE DIDN'T COME UP DURING DIAGNOSTIC HE WAS UNSURE. THE CONSUMER MENTION A SERVICE BULLETIN (DOCUMENT ID 1538353, #PIP3022A- DATED JULY 19, 2004) WHICH THE DEALER WAS AWARE OF. THE CONSUMER HAD THE DEALER REMOVE THE TANK AND INDEED THE FUEL PUMP MODULE ON THE TRUCK HAD THE SAME PART NUMBER MENTIONED IN THE SERVICE BULLETIN. THE MANUFACTURER HAS REFUSED ANY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT'S HUSBAND HEARD A NOISE IN THE VEHICLE. SHE THOUGHT IT WAS THE BRAKES BECAUSE IT SOUNDED LIKE METAL TO METAL. WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS CHECKED AT THE DEALERSHIP ONE COULD PULL THE TIRE OUT BECAUSE THE PIN THAT HELD THE AXLE HAD DROPPED DOWN INTO THE DIFFERENTIAL UNIT. THIS COULD HAVE CAUSED A SERIOUS ACCIDENT. THE CONTACT PURCHASED AN EXTENDED WARRANTY. THE DRIVER SIDE WAS REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY BUT THE EXTENDED WARRANTY COMPANY WOULD NOT AGREE TO REPLACE THE PASSENGER SIDE EVEN UNDER THE WARRANTY. *AK

DT: HAD THE VEHICLE ON THE JACK AND THE VEHICLE FELL OFF THE JACK, THIS HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2005. THE JACK HAS A SMALL BASE , IT'S ABOUT 4X5 OR 4X6. HE CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER, THEY SAID TO CONTACT NHTSA. *AK *NM

DT: 2004 CHEVROLET SILVERADO. THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE STALLED WHILE DRIVING ON THE ROAD. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS THAT COME ON BEFORE THIS HAPPENED. THIS HAS HAPPENED EVERY TIME UNDER 50 MPH. WAS ABLE TO BE PULL OVER THE VEHICLE AND RESTARTED IT IMMEDIATELY. THE DEALERSHIP COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS RESTARTED IT VOIDED THE CHIPS MEMORY. THIS HAS HAPPENED SIX TIMES. THE CONSUMER HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO DEALER,AND THE DEALERSHIP COULD NOT FIND THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. THE CONSUMER SENT CHEVROLET A REGISTERED LETTER WITH THE INFORMATION, THE CLAIM WAS DENIED. THE PROBLEM STARTED ON JUNE 29, 2005, AND THE LAST TIME THIS HAPPENED WAS AUGUST 19, 2005. EVERY TIME THIS HAPPENED THE CONSUMER CALLED THE DEALERSHIP. *AK THE DEALER DETERMINED THERE WAS A LOWER CELL N THE BATTERY AND REPLACED IT BUT THE STALING PROBLEM RECURRED. THE CONSUMER WOULD LIKE FOR THE MANUFACTURER TO BUY BACK THE VEHICLE. *NM

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THAT 2004 CHEVROLET SILVERADO FAILED TO STOP AND CRASHED INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE SPEED WAS AROUND 40 MPH WHEN THE DRIVER WENT TO APPLY THE BRAKES AND THE ABS DID NOT ENGAGE. THE BRAKE PEDAL WENT COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR. THE CONTACT WAS STANDING UP IN THE VEHICLE AND MASHED THE BRAKE TO THE FLOOR. THERE WAS PLENTY TIME TO STOP, BUT THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE WENT SLIDING INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. THIS CREATED A CHAIN REACTION WITH OTHER VEHICLES. THE TOTAL OF NUMBER OF VEHICLE INVOLVED IN THE ACCIDENT WERE FOUR. NEITHER THE DEALERSHIP NOR THE MANUFACTURER WERE CONTACTED ABOUT THE BRAKE FAILURE. A POLICE REPORT WAS TAKEN. THERE IS A PICTURE OF THE FRONT END OF THE DRIVERS VEHICLE. THE PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKES WAS INTERMITTENT. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN CHECKED FOR THE BRAKE PROBLEM BY A DEALERSHIP OR INDEPENDENT PARTY. THE PROPERTY DAMAGE DID AFFECT THREE OTHER VEHICLES.*AK UPDATED 11/29/05. *JB

LIGHT TICKING NOISE FROM ENGINE FROM ABOUT 30,000 MILES BY 45,000 MILES THE NOISE IS MUCH MORE NOTICEABLE LIKE LIFTERS TAPPING. FAILURE WAS WITH ONE OF THE CAM SHAFT LOBES CHIPPING OFF A SUBSTANTIAL PIECE OF METAL ( BRAKE FAILURE AS OPPOSED TO BEING WIPED ). THE REPAIR HAS NOT YET BEEN COMPLETED BUT WILL REQUIRE NEW CAM SHAFT, LIFTERS, HEAD BOLTS, GASKET KIT. *JB

TRAILER BRAKE WIRING HARNESS. I RECENTLY PURCHASED A TRAILER WHICH REQUIRED A ELECTRONIC BRAKE. AFTER HAVING THE BRAKING SYSTEM INSTALLED BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE TRAILER I WAS INFORMED OF THE PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKING HARNESS ON THE VEHICLE. I THEN CALLED THE DEALER FOR MORE INFORMATION, THEY RECOMMENDED I TAKE IT TO ANOTHER TRAILER DEALER AND HAVE IT LOOKED AT. THAT'S WHEN I FOUND OUT THAT THE WIRING HARNESS WAS ONLY RECEIVING 4 VOLTS, THE BRAKING SYSTEM REQUIRES 12 VOLTS. *JB

DT: THE FUEL TANK FELL OFF THE VEHICLE. THE CONSUMER NOTICED THIS PROBLEM ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2005. THE CONSUMER HAS NOT TAKEN VEHICLE TO A DEALERSHIP YET. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THAT TWO BRACKETS BROKE, CAUSING THE TANK TO HANG CLOSE TO THE ROAD. THE CONSUMER FELT THAT IT WAS DANGEROUS TO MOVE THE VEHICLE BECAUSE OF THE FUEL TANK BEING SO CLOSE TO THE GROUND. *AK THE FUEL TANK WAS REPAIRED. *JB