2015 TESLA MODEL S Complaints

THE HOME CHARGING UNIT WAS OVERHEATING CAUSING A FAILURE OF THE MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR MY HOUSE. THE WEAR ON THE MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER WAS SEVERE ENOUGH THAT THE BREAKER HAD TO BE REPLACED OR WOULD HAVE BEEN A FIRE HAZARD FOR THE HOUSE. THE CAR WAS NOT MOVING AND IN THE GARAGE AT THE TIME.

ON MAY 20, 2019, THIS CAR WAS ISSUED A FORCED, OTA-UPDATE FROM TESLA, VERSIONS 2019.16.1 AND 2019.16.2 AS A RESULT OF WHAT IS BELIEVED TO BE A RESPONSE TO THE SERIES OF MULTIPLE BATTERY FIRES WORLDWIDE INVOLVING TESLA'S ELECTRIC VEHICLES. WITHOUT DISCLOSING WHAT THE SOFTWARE UPDATES WOULD DO OR WHAT NEGATIVE AFFECTS THEY WOULD HAVE, TESLA FORCED THESE UPDATES WITHOUT TELLING MY CLIENT AND OTHER AFFECTED OWNERS THAT THEIR BATTERIES WOULD BE LIMITED AND CHARGING SPEEDS WOULD BE THROTTLED, EFFECTIVELY AND SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASING THE RANGE AND SPEED OF CHARGING FOR THEIR CARS. TESLA ADVERTISED MY CLIENT'S SPECIFIC YEAR, MAKE AND MODEL (2015 MODEL S 70D) AS HAVING AN APPROXIMATE EPA ESTIMATED 240 MILES OF RANGE. THIS CASE HAS BEEN FILED AS A CLASS ACTION WHICH IS ALREADY PENDING IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CA, CASE NUMBER 5:19-CV-04596-VKD, BY THE NAMED CLASS PLAINTIFF AND REPRESENTATIVE DAVID RASMUSSEN. THIS OFFICE REPRESENTS MR. RASMUSSEN, AS WELL AS MR. LIN AND VARIOUS ADDITIONAL OWNERS OF THESE AFFECTED VEHICLES, INCLUDING RESIDENTS IN DIFFERENT STATES ACROSS THE COUNTY. TO DATE, TESLA HAS PROFFERED THE EXPLANATION THAT THE UPDATES WERE DONE IN ORDER TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH AND BATTERY LONGEVITY FOR THE VEHICLES, HOWEVER, THERE IS A CORRELATION BETWEEN THE AGE OF THESE CARS, THE RECENT FIRES, AND ANY CORRESPONDING WARRANTIES WITH THESE CARS BY WHICH TESLA APPEARS TO TRY AND AVOID. THUS, CUSTOMERS ARE LEFT COMPLETELY WITHOUT ANY REMEDY TO THE ISSUES CAUSED BY TESLA, AS NCDS ARBITRATORS ACROSS THE U.S. ARE UNABLE TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE FACT THAT TESLA HAS COMMITTED THESE ILLEGAL, UNFAIR, DECEPTIVE, AND FRAUDULENT ACTS, OR ARE UNABLE TO DUE TO THE LIMITED SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS BY WHICH NCDS ARBITRATORS ARE BOUND TO.

TL* TAKATA RECALL. THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 TESLA MODEL S. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 19V002000 (AIR BAGS); HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. TESLA (746 AUAHI ST, HONOLULU, HI 96813, (808) 680-9260) WAS CONTACTED AND CONFIRMED THAT THE PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE RECALL REMEDY. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. PARTS DISTRIBUTION DISCONNECT.

WHILE CRESTING A HILL ON AUTOPILOT, THE VEHICLE ABRUPTLY ATTEMPTED TO STEER INTO ONCOMING TRAFFIC. THIS APPARENTLY IS NOT AN ISOLATED ISSUE. SEE THIS INTERNET THREAD: HTTPS://TESLAMOTORSCLUB.COM/TMC/THREADS/AUTOPILOT-ISSUES-WITH-HILLS-AP1.141429/

EXCESSIVE CORROSION ON STEERING U-JOINT CAUSING LOCKUP AND EXCESSIVE FORCE TO TURN WHEEL, REQUIRING REPAIR. EXCESSIVE CORROSION ON CONTROL SUSPENSION ARMS, REQUIRING REPAIR.

* THE FIRST INPUT VIN IS PROVISIONAL. THE CAR CORRESPONDS TO TESLA MODEL S, BUT ALSO INCLUDES OTHER TESLA. HELLO. I AM ONE OF THE JAPANESE DRIVERS. I SAW THE FOLLOWING NEWS YESTERDAY (8/26). --------------------------- SUYASUYA SLEEP IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT, AUTOMATIC DRIVING OVER 100 KM? 8/24 (SAT) 18:21 BROADCAST TELE MORNING NEWS ALL NIPPON NEWSNETWORK (ANN) A MAN WHO SLEEPS IN A CAR THAT RUNS AT A SPEED OF MORE THAN 100 KM / H. SITTING IS THE DRIVER'S SEAT, NOT THE PASSENGER SEAT. --------------------------- I SAW THIS NEWS AND THOUGHT IT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS NOT 'NOT RECOMMENDED TO DOZE DURING AUTOMATIC DRIVING', BUT 'DOES NOT FALL ASLEEP DURING AUTOMATIC DRIVING'. IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING IS WRITTEN IN THE NEWS READER COMMENTS. -------------------------- ②UNKNOWN TESLA VEHICLES DON'T WEAR A DETECTOR TO DELIBERATELY FALL ASLEEP. THERE IS A REASON WHY YOU CAN'T DO IT WITH A SIMPLE DEVICE. IT IS SET TO THE PREFERENCE OF AMERICANS, AND IS USED TO COLLECT DATA. IF AN ACCIDENT OCCURS, THE NEXT PROGRAM WILL BE MODIFIED AND THE PROGRAM WILL BE REWRITTEN ON THE VEHICLE TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. AND IT LEADS TO COMPLETION THROUGH AN EXPERIMENTAL STAGE. EVEN IF A VICTIM COMES OUT, IT IS DESCRIBED IN THE CAR'S INSTRUCTION MANUAL NOT TO LET GO AND DRIVE, THUS CLEARING THE LEGAL PROBLEM. AND WHENEVER A PROBLEM OCCURS, TESLA SAYS THAT 'THE AUTOMATIC DRIVING FUNCTION IS A SYSTEM THAT SUPPORTS THE DRIVER HOLDING THE STEERING WHEEL' AND DOES NOT RECOMMEND SLEEPING DURING AUTOMATIC DRIVING. COMMENT. -------------------------- ③WISE ***** IF THAT IS TRUE, THE MANUFACTURER WILL BE TESTING THE CONSUMER'S REPUTATION AS A HUMAN PILLAR AND WILL BE CHALLENGED WITH A MAJOR MORAL VIOLATION. --------------------------- PLEASE TELL US ABOUT YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE ABOVE.

MODEL S FLOOR MATS ARE SECURED VIA 4 VELCRO PADS, SCREWED INTO THE FLOOR ON ONE SIDE, "GLUED" ONTO THE MATS ON THE OTHER. AFTER 3.5 YEARS OF NORMAL USE, DRIVER'S SIDE FLOOR MAT CAME LOOSE WHILE DRIVING. PULLED INTO A PARKING LOT AND REMOVED MAT UNTIL I GOT HOME. FOUND TWO PADS COMPLETELY UNSTUCK FROM MAT, TWO OTHERS ROLLED INTO THEMSELVES AND PARTIALLY STICKING TO THE MAT. CAUSE APPEARS TO BE THE ADHESIVE GLUING THE VELCRO PADS TO THE MAT BREAKING DOWN/DEGRADING, RENDERING THE ADHESIVE INEFFECTIVE. SUSPECT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW THAT MAY AFFECT OTHER TESLAS OF SIMILAR AGE/DESIGN OVER TIME.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 TESLA MODEL S. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE INSTRUMENT PANEL SCREEN WAS ILLEGIBLE BECAUSE IT WAS FILLED WITH A LIQUID THAT STARTED TO LEAK. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO TESLA (3555 MANCHESTER TRAFFIC WAY, KANSAS CITY, MO 64129) WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE INSTRUMENT PANEL SCREEN NEEDED TO BE REPLACED, NOT READABLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 47,000. *BF*JB

LEFT FRONT CONTROL ARM BROKE AT 70MPH ON HIGHWAY. WAS LUCKILY ABLE TO GET TO THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. IT CAUSED DAMAGE TO INSIDE WHEEL WELL AND WORE THROUGH CAUSING BATTERY TO LOSE ALL COOLANT. CAR IS 3 1/2 YEARS OLD WITH 113,000 MILES.

I JUST JOINED THE BROKEN FORELINK CLUB. MY 2015 S P90D DEVELOPED AN ERRATIC LOW "THUMP" SOUND FROM THE FRONT END WHILE DRIVING HOME - FORTUNATELY ON LOW SPEED STREETS. NEXT DAY I PLANNED TO TAKE IT TO THE SERVICE CENTER TO HAVE IT CHECKED, BUT WHILE BACKING OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY, TURNING THE WHEEL TO THE RIGHT TO JOIN THE STREET, IT MADE AN OMINOUS CRUNCHING SOUND AND SHUT OFF. FINALLY, THE CAR REBOOTED AND I SLOWLY MOVED UP THE DRIVEWAY AND STOPPED. WHEN I TURNED THE WHEEL TO THE RIGHT, I COULD SEE THE TIRE HITTING THE REAR OF THE WHEEL WELL - THE CAR AGAIN SHUT ITSELF OFF. I CALLED TESLA ROADSIDE SERVICE, A FLATBED CAME, THE CAR REBOOTED LONG ENOUGH TO STRAIGHTEN THE WHEELS AND GET THE CAR ON THE TRUCK. THE TRUCK DRIVER SAID HE HAD SEEN THIS BEFORE, AND THAT WHOLE WHEEL WELLS HAD DISINTEGRATED. THEY REPLACED BOTH FORELINKS WITH "IMPROVED" PARTS. IT IS FRIGHTENING TO THINK OF WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED AT 75 MPH ON THE FREEWAY! I'M NOT SURE HOW MUCH I TRUST THE REPAIR FROM WHAT I HAVE READ IN THE TESLA FORUM - NUMEROUS SUCH FAILURES - BUT I WILL CERTAINLY KEEP AN EAR OUT FOR LOW-FREQUENCY THUMPS - ANOTHER VIGILANCE TASK. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A RECALL. SHAME ON TESLA . . .