2004 TOYOTA TUNDRA Complaints

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 TOYOTA TUNDRA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS SEVERELY CORRODED AND AFFECTED THE POWER TRAIN, REAR END, WHEEL, AXLE AND BELT HOUSING. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: PE09049 (FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE , SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC , STRUCTURE , TIRES) AND THE DEALER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 86,000.

MASSIVE GENERALIZED RUST UNDER VEHICLE. THIS IS AFFECTING THE FRAME, SUSPENSION, ALL LINES, EXHAUST, ALL METAL FITTINGS, WHEELS, BRAKES, SPARE TIRE. MY MECHANIC DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO PROCEED AND SUGGESTED WE NO LONGER DRIVE THIS VEHICLE. TOYOTA DEALER SAID THIS IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RUST RECALL WHICH IS IN EFFECT FOR TUNDRA TRUCKS EXACTLY LIKE THIS ONE , BUT OFF BY A COUPLE MONTHS BY MANUFACTURING DATE. OUR TOYOTA DEALER DID NOT HAVE A SUGGESTION OR ANSWER FOR HOW TO FIX THIS, OTHER THAN TO ASK IF WE WERE INTERESTED IN BUYING A NEW CAR. WE BOUGHT THIS TRUCK NEW AND HAVE TAKEN EXCELLENT CARE OF IT. THE INSIDE AND UPPER BODY LOOKS NEW. *TR

HAD TRUCK IN FOR OIL CHANGE WHOLE FRAME, DRIVE SHAFT PARKING BRAKE CABLE IS RUSTING THROUGH. *TT

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 TOYOTA TUNDRA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN STATIONARY FOR THREE MONTHS. A PASSENGER ATTEMPTED TO START THE VEHICLE BUT IT WOULD NOT START. THE PASSENGER'S SIDE AIR BAG THEN INADVERTENTLY DEPLOYED WITHOUT WARNING. THE PASSENGER SUSTAINED FACIAL LACERATIONS, SEVERE BRUISING AND A LOSS OF HEARING AS A RESULT OF THE ERRONEOUS AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT, AND WAS TRANSPORTED TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM FOR TREATMENT. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT REFERENCED NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V133000 (AIR BAGS) BUT HAD NOT CONFIRMED IF THE VEHICLE WAS INCLUDED IN THE RECALL. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 100,000. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE.

DURING OUR 2013 INSPECTION WE WERE TOLD WE HAVE SEVERE CORROSION IN THE UNDER CARRIAGE... WE TOOK IT TO THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP WHERE WE WERE TOLD THERE HAS BEEN A RECALL ON 2000,2001,2002,2003. NOT 2004. OUR TUNDRA WAS BUILT IN MARCH 2004 AND HAS THE SAME CORROSION. HOWEVER, NO RECALL YET. WE JUST HAD OUR 2014 INSPECTION DONE AND THE VEHICLE FAILED. WE CAN NO LONGER PUT IT ON THE ROAD...SO- WE HAVE A 10 YEAR OLD VEHICLE, 30,800 MILES AND IF WE WANT TO HAVE THE CORROSION REPAIRED IT WILL COST APPROX. $10,000... IS THERE ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO HELP? ARE THERE ANY CLASS ACTION LAW SUITS WE COULD JOIN? I'M SURE THERE ARE OTHER SIMILAR MAKES AND MODELS ON THE ROAD WITH THIS VERY ISSUE. UNBELIEVABLE POSSIBILITY OF ACCIDENTS. WE EVEN HAD TO TAKE THE SPARE TIRE OFF FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE AS WE FEARED IT WOULD FALL OFF ON THE HIGHWAY... *TR

WHILE MY 2004 TUNDRA WAS IN THE DEALERS FOR A REPAIR, THE SERVICEMAN NOTICED A CORROSION PERFORATION IN RIGHT FRONT FRAME RAIL. I WAS INFORMED THAT THE VEHICLE WOULD NO LONGER PAST INSPECTION UNLESS A $10,000 FRAME REPLACEMENT WAS DONE. THIS IS A LOW MILEAGE VEHICLE WHICH WAS MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE. DAMAGE IS DUE TO MANUFACTURING DEFECT. *TR

EXCESSIVE RUST ON FRAME, UNDER BODY, AND SUSPENSION. REAR AXLE / DIFFERENTIAL HAS LARGE FLAKING RUST SO BAD THAT IT WILL NOT HOLD LUBRICANT. FILED COMPLAINT WITH TOYOTA ON 11/13/2013 AND WAS GIVEN A CASE # AND TURNED IN PHOTOS AT LOCAL TOYOTA DEALER IN EARLY DECEMBER 2013. CONTACTED TOYOTA IN JANUARY 2014 AND WAS TOLD THAT A RECALL WAS GOING TO BE ISSUED BUT IT WOULD COVER FRAME ONLY AND NO OTHER COMPONENTS WOULD BE COVERED FOR RUST. I PERSONALLY TOOK IT UPON MYSELF NOT TO DRIVE THIS VEHICLE BECAUSE I FEEL IT IS UNSAFE AND NOT ROAD WORTHY DUE TO RUST. I ALSO FEEL THAT A COMPANY THAT I HAD A LOT OF RESPECT FOR BECAUSE OF THEIR REPUTATION FOR QUALITY AND SAFETY HAS LET ME DOWN. VEHICLE HAS BEEN PARKED SINCE 11/13/2013 AND WILL NOT BE DRIVEN UNTIL PROPERLY REPAIRED OR REPLACED. *TR

AFTER A SCHEDULED OIL CHANGE THE MECHANIC SUGGESTED I TAKE MY TRUCK TO A TOYOTA DEALER TO CHECK OUT THE UNDERCARRIAGE RUST. WHEN TO MASSEY TOYOTA, WHITE OAK, PA . THEY SAID I NEED TO DEAL WITH IT BUT IT WOULD COST SEVERAL HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS BECAUSE TOYOTA DOESN'T HAVE A RECALL ON 2004. I'VE TALKED TO OTHER TUNDRA OWNER WITH THE SAME PROBLEMS. WHEN IS TOYOTA GOING TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS MANUFACTURING PROBLEM AS YOU DID PREVIOUS MODELS? I CURRENTLY OWN TWO TOYOTA'S: TUNDRA AND CAMRY. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 TOYOTA TUNDRA. THE CONTACT STATED THE HE TOOK HIS VEHICLE IN FOR A CHECK UP AND WAS INFORMED THAT HIS SUBFRAME WAS CORRODED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 67,500. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2004 TOYOTA TUNDRA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE AT AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, HE WAS INFORMED THAT THE FRAME WAS SEVERELY CORRODED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000.