2001 ISUZU RODEO Complaints

I OWN A 2001 ISUZU RODEO, ON DECEMBER 24TH 2009 I HAD JUST DROPPED MY DAUGHTER OFF AND HOME AND WAS HEADED BACK TO THE STORE WHEN MY CAR STARTING ACTING FUNNY AND ALMOST FLIPPED. I GOT THE CAR UNDER CONTROL AND TO A STOP. I GET OUT OF THE CAR AND SEE SOMETHING UNDERNEATH MY CAR BROKEN OFF. I CALL MY SON-IN-LAW TO COME HELP ME. HE LOOKS UNDERNEATH THE CAR AND NOTICES THE TRAILING ARM BROKEN OFF, HE SAID MOM IT'S A WONDER YOU HADN'T BEEN KILLED! YOUR FRAME UNDERNEATH YOUR CAR IS TOTALLY RUSTED! SO I HAVE 4 DIFFERENT MECHANICS LOOK AT ME ISUZU AND ALL OF THEM SAY THE SAME THING, YOUR FRAME IS COMPLETELY RUSTED OUT AND FIXING THAT TRAILING ARM WOULD BE A DANGER. THEY REFUSED TO FIX IT! SO MY CAR WAS RECALLED FOR THE TRAILING ARM BUT NOT THE RUSTED FRAME, WHICH WILL NOT FIX THE PROBLEM! . ISUZU PICKED MY CAR UP JANUARY 4TH 2011 AND TAKES TO THEIR REPAIR GARAGE. I CALL TWO WEEKS LATER BECAUSE NO ONE EVER CONTACTED ME. THEY TELL ME THE MECHANIC REFUSED TO FIX THE TRAILING ARM AND HAVE ME DRIVE THIS DANGEROUS CAR HOME. HE SAID THE FRAME WAS RUSTED WORSE THAN ANY OF THEM THEY HAVE SEEN. SO I WAIT A FEW MORE WEEKS AND CALL ISUZU RELATIONS DEPT. THEY PROCEED TO TELL ME THAT THEY YELLED AT THE MECHANIC FOR TELLING HE REFUSED TO FIX THIS CAR BECAUSE IT CAN BE FIXED. I WAS TOLD THEY WOULD FIX IT. SO I WAITED ANOTHER WEEK AND CALL BACK AGAIN TO BE TOLD THEY TRIED TO FIX THE TRAILING ARM AND THE RUST WAS SO BAD UNDERNEATH THAT MY GAS TANK BRACKETS BROKE OFF DURING THE REPAIR. AND I WAS TOLD THAT THE BRACKETS ARE NO LONGER MADE AND IT CAN'T BE FIXED! PLEASE START ANOTHER RECALL ON THESE CARS, THE FRAME IS THE PROBLEM NOT THE TRAILING ARM. THESE CARS COULD KILL AN INNOCENT FAMILY. ISUZU STILL REFUSING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT MY CAR. IF THEY THINK I'M DIVING AROUND WITH A RUSTED FRAME AND BROKEN GAS TANK BRACKETS THEY ARE CRAZY! I WILL PARK THIS CAR IN MY DRIVEWAY ANOTHER 2 YEARS IF I HAVE TO UNTIL THE REAL PROBLEM IS TAKEN CARE OF! PLEASE HELP US, THANK YOU *TR

2001 ISUZU RODEO. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO A ROTTED AWAY FRAME *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED A PORTION OF THE FRAME BECAME DETACHED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE CONSUMER STATED A RECALL WAS ISSUED REGARDING THE PROBLEM. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE PART WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE UNTIL JULY 1ST. *JB

LETTER FROM CONGRESSMAN ON BEHALF OF CONSTITUENT REGARDING HER 2001 ISUZU RODEO; SHE WOULD LIKE ISUZU TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RUSTED FRAME AND OFFER AN ACCEPTABLE BUYBACK. *KB THE CONSUMER STATED HER SON WAS DRIVING THE VEHICLE, WHEN SUDDENLY HE WAS UNABLE TO CONTROL IT. THE CONSUMER HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO HER LOCAL MECHANIC WHO INFORMED HER THAT THE FRAME HAD RUSTED AND CRACKED AND IT WOULD NOT PASS INSPECTION. THE CONSUMER DISCOVERED THERE WAS RECALL ON THE BRACKETS ATTACHING THE AXLE TO THE FRAME. ISUZU HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO A LOCAL DEALERSHIP. UPON THEIR INSPECTION OF THE VEHICLE, THE VEHICLE COULD NOT BE REPAIRED UNDER THE RECALL DUE TO THE SEVERITY OF THE RUST AND THE FRAME BEING CRACKED. THE CONSUMER WAS VERBALLY OFFERED 3,000 AS A COURTESY AND GAVE HER THREE DAYS TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE. THE CONSUMER STATED SHE DID AGREE TO THE OFFER, BUT HAS NOT PURSUED IT FURTHER. *JB

2001 ISUZU RODEO. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO A DEFECTIVE FRAME *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED AS SHE WAS HAVING ANOTHER SERVICE PERFORMED, THE MECHANIC INFORMED HER THE VEHICLE WAS NOT SAFE TO DRIVE. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER AND WAS INFORMED THERE WAS A RECALL, BUT IT HAD NOT BEEN MADE PUBLIC. THE CONSUMER STATED SHE FINALLY RECEIVED A RECALL LETTER AND THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHO KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 54 DAYS. THE CONSUMER STATED SHE WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION, THE VEHICLE WAS GOING TO BE REPAIRED, BUT THE DEALER ONLY PLACED TWO BRACKETS ON THE VEHICLE AND DID NOT REPLACE THE FRAME. THE CONSUMER WAS QUOTED AN EXTREMELY HIGH PRICE FOR REPLACING THE FRAME. *JB

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ISUZU RODEO. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, SHE NOTICED THAT THE ENTIRE FRAME SEPARATED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO HER HOME. AFTER SHE INSPECTED THE VEHICLE, SHE NOTICED THAT IT WAS CORRODED. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN INSPECTED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND ADVISED HER THAT THERE WAS A RECALL AND FOR HER TO TAKE IT TO A DEALER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 60,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ISUZU RODEO. THE VEHICLE WAS INCLUDED IN THE RECALL ASSOCIATED WITH NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 10V436000 (SUSPENSION:REAR). THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE CONTACT WAS TOLD THEY COULD PERFORM THE RECALL REMEDY BUT THE VEHICLE WOULD STILL BE UNSAFE TO DRIVE BECAUSE THE ENTIRE FRAME WAS CORRODED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 73,000. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.

TOTAL FRAME RUSTED OUT ON 2001 ISUZU RODEO. I WAS TOLD NOT TO DRIVE IT. ONLY 72,000 MILES ON IT. ISUZU ONLY RECALLED THE BRACKETS ATTACHED TO THE FRAMES AND ARE SENDING PEOPLE BACK OUT ON TO THE ROAD WITH ROTTING FRAMES. THERE NEEDS TO BE ANOTHER RECALL FOR THE FRAMES SO THAT WE DON'T ALL HAVE TO BUY NEW VEHICLES. ISUZU IS CHEATING PEOPLE ON THE BUY BACK AMOUNTS. THERE IS NO FIX TO THIS PROBLEM EXCEPT FOR REPLACING THE BAD SECTION OF FRAME OR IN SOME CASES, THE ENTIRE FRAME. *TR

2001 RODEO LSE IN EXCELLENT CONDITION HAS A COMPLETELY RUSTED OUT FRAME. CAR FISHTAILED AND NEARLY FLIPPED OVER. HAD IT TOWED BUT WAS TOLD IT NEEDED A WHOLE NEW FRAME AND TO FIND A BODY SHOP. DID SOME RESEARCH AND DISCOVERED ISUZU WAS GOING TO ISSUE A RECALL LATER THAT MONTH. LONG STORY SHORT. MY CAR HAS BEEN SITTING SINCE DECMEBER 2010. NO ONE CONTACTS ME, I HAVE TOC ALL SEVERAL TIMES AND STAY ON HOLD MINIMUM OF 30MINS EACH TIME. TOLD MY CAR WAS A T5?? UNREPAIRABLE AND WOULD BE ON THE "BUY BACK" LIST. ALMOST ENTERING THE 3RD MONTH, I'VE SPENT A LOT OF MONEY ON CAR RENTALS. ISUZU OFFERS NO HELP AND HAS NO TIME LINE. IN FACT WHEN I CALLED ISUZU IN DECEMBER WHEN IT FIRST HAPPENED AND GUY AT ISUZU SAID HE SAW THE REPAIR PROCESS AND HE FELT WHAT WAS BEING DONE FOR THE RECALL FIX WAS "OVERKILL" AND MY CAR WOULD BE UP AND RUNNING..WON'T BE OVERKILL WHEN SOMEONE DIES FROM THIS! THEN IT TAKES 2 1/2 MONTHS TO TELL ME MY BABY IS UNREPAIRABLE! WHAT ABOUT ALL THE WORK AND MONEY SPENT KEEPING THIS CAR IN TOP SHAPE? WHAT ABOUT THE $800 I JUST SPENT ON TIRES BEFORE THIS HAPPENED? NOT ONLY IS THIS FINANCIALLY STRESSFUL BUT EMOTIONALLY STRESSFUL AS WELL. WHO HAS TIME WHILE AT WORK TO CALL AND STAY ON HOLD ANYWHERE FROM 30MINS AND UP?? NO ONE. TO ONLY BE GIVEN THE RUN AROUND AND THAT I NEED TO WAIT FOR ISUZU TO CALL ME BACK! NOT TO MENTION ALSO OWN A 99 RODEO STARTING TO RUST NOT HAS BAD. I DON'T EVEN HAVE THE ENERGY AND MENTAL STRENGTH TO GET THIS CAR CHECKED AND ON THE "LIST"! BUT FOR MY FAMILIES SAFETY I WILL TAKE IT TO GET INSPECTED THIS WEEK! *TR

I RECEIVED A RECALL #10V-436 FORM IN THE MAIL FROM THE ISUZU OWNER RELATIONS CENTER 1400 S. DOUGLASS ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHELM, CA 92806 ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 2010. IT STATED THAT I SHOULD CALL ISUZU SPECIAL ASSISTANCE CENTER TO IDENTIFY THE ISUZU SERVICE CENTER CLOSEST TO ME. I WAS TOLD THE PARTS TO REPAIR MY VEHICLE WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE UNTIL THE MIDDLE OF JANUARY 2011. I CALLED AND AN APPOINTMENT FOR FEBRUARY 18, 2011 AT BOURNIVAL ISUZU WHERE I BOUGHT THE SUV BRAND NEW IN AUGUST 2001. THE SUV WAS DUE FOR A STICKER JANUARY 2011. JANUARY 10 2011 THIS VEHICLE WAS IN AN ACCIDENT. THERE WAS MINOR DAMAGE TO THE REAR LEFT SIDE TOTALING $2,800. WHEN THE BODY SHOP FURTHER INVESTIGATING UNDER THE VEHICLE HE NOTICED EXTENSIVE FRAME DAMAGE ROTTING WITH HOLES AND EXTENSIVE RUST. HE DETERMINED THE SUV WAS UNSAFE. HE ALSO NOTICED THE AXEL WAS 3/4 OF AN INCH OUT OF LINE. HE THEN CALLED OUR INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE ADJUSTER REINVESTIGATED THE VEHICLE. THE ADJUSTER AT THIS TIME TOTALED THE SUV. THE INSURANCE COMPANY TOOK OWNERSHIP OF THE VEHICLE AND SUBTRACTED A LARGE SUM OF MONEY FROM THE FINALE AMOUNT BECAUSE OF THE HOLES AND RUST HE FOUND ON THE FRAME UNDERCARRIAGE, TO LOOK AT THIS VEHICLE YOU WOULD HAVE THOUGHT IT WAS YEARS YOUNGER THEN IT WAS. THERE WAS NO RUST, DENTS OR SCRATCHES. THIS VEHICLE SHOULD HAVE GONE ANOTHER 100,000 MILES AT LEAST. IT WAS GARAGED AND METICULOUSLY MAINTAINED WITH RECORDS FROM THE DATE OF PURCHASE. I WAS TOLD BY FRIENDS IT DROVE AND SOUNDED LIKE A BRAND NEW AUTOMOBILE. MY INTENTION WAS TO HAVE IT FOR TEN MORE YEARS. AT THIS TIME I AM REQUESTING THE AMOUNT DISQUALIFIED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE FRAME METAL DECOMPOSITION AND AN AMOUNT FOR LOSS OF LONGEVITY AND FAILURE TO FULFILL MY EXPECTATIONS.

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ISUZU RODEO. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING 20 MPH WHEN THE CONTACT SUDDENLY LOST CONTROL IN THE STEERING, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO SWERVE OFF OF THE ROAD. THE CONTACT GAINED CONTROL AND TURNED THE ENGINE OFF. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THEY STATED THAT THE REAR DRIVER SIDE FRAME WAS SEVERELY CORRODED AND THE LOWER BRACKET FRACTURED. THE CONTACT REFERENCED RECALL 10V436000 (SUSPENSION: REAR). THE TECHNICIAN REFUSED TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE AND STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS BEYOND REPAIR. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 71,000.